Here’s a bold statement: the global illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is a silent crisis fueling conflicts, destabilizing regions, and claiming countless lives—yet it often flies under the radar. But here’s where it gets controversial: how can nations balance the right to self-defense with the urgent need to curb the flow of these deadly weapons? On November 5, 2025 (November 4 local time), a significant step was taken when the Draft Resolution titled The Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects was adopted by consensus in the First Committee of the United Nations General Assembly. Submitted by Japan, alongside Colombia and South Africa, and co-sponsored by 78 countries, this resolution is set to be formally considered at the General Assembly’s plenary session in December.
And this is the part most people miss: the resolution isn’t just a piece of paper—it’s a renewed global commitment to tackle a problem that affects every corner of the world. It underscores the critical importance of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat, and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA), a framework designed to address this issue comprehensively. By reaffirming states’ dedication to implementing the PoA, the resolution highlights the need for concrete actions, from strengthening border controls to enhancing international cooperation.
Additionally, the resolution applauds the Fourth Review Conference of the PoA, held in 2024, and ensures the execution of its outcome document, including the organization of key meetings to keep momentum alive. This isn’t just bureaucratic jargon—it’s about saving lives and preventing weapons from falling into the wrong hands.
Here’s the controversial question: While the resolution is a step forward, is it enough? Critics argue that without stricter enforcement mechanisms, illicit arms trafficking will persist. What do you think? Does this resolution go far enough, or is it merely a symbolic gesture? Share your thoughts in the comments—let’s spark a conversation that could shape the future of global security.
